Decentralization doesn’t mean anarchy. Along with, they are usually a lot better than the people implemented by the a main coordinator as they possibly can become created faster and you can from inside the perspective of one’s societal norms and you may society of the people who happen to be subject to it.
Decentralization does not always mean most of some thing naturally. Discover “decentralized” setups who do moderation fairly well (elizabeth.grams., Mastodon or really oldschool internet online forums, in which there is in the course of time anyone bad). So it (Nostr), specifically , produces enjoyable of such configurations.
So you can modest one program, there has to be affordances for moderation and you will somebody(s) guilty towards the profiles of your own program. In so far as i can say, like any blockchain ideas, the brand new Nostr project has effectively removed (nearly) the affordances to possess undertaking moderation. Because the new Nostr audience appears to convergence a lot more having crypto fans, In my opinion the posture is basically an identical: no moderation, zero “censorship”, an such like. Since the there is practically child pornography kept into the Bitcoin blockchain at this time, I do not envision your own argument holds you to “decentralization” can simply Jeff Goldblum it and you may “be able” as opposed to specific affordances / responsibility.
Nostr tends to make fun of your own idea that you will get central moderation and you can moves they explicitly for the relays. It’s as much as the brand new relay holder to determine what is anticipate or not. Continue reading